Knowable Word - Bible study help

Cómo interpretar: Contestar preguntas

June 2, 2026 By Peter Krol

This is a Spanish translation of a post from our archive. For the original post in English, please click the “Publicación original” link at the top of the post. For further explanation of why we’re posting articles in Spanish for a season, see this announcement.

————

Publicación original de Peter Krol, traducida por Sarah Oiler

————

Esta semana hablaré del segundo paso para interpretar la Biblia.

El paso dos fue responder a las preguntas formuladas por el texto:

“Una vez que has formulado tus preguntas, respóndelas. Sin embargo, hay una regla fundamental: responde a las preguntas sólo si son contestadas (explícita o implícitamente) en el texto (Prov 30:5-6).

No te pierdas en detalles complicados. No utilices los detalles de menor importancia para hacer que el texto diga lo que quieres que diga. No construyas toda una teología de un versículo. En su lugar, responde sólo aquellas preguntas que se asumen o abordan en el texto. Deja que el resto fluya.” (traducido por Evangelio blog, modificado por mí)

Hay dos tipos de respuestas que existe “en el texto”:

Algunas respuestas se infieren del texto. Los lectores originales habrían sabido estas respuestas, pero nos resultan incomprensibles debido a los miles de años que separan nuestras vidas de las suyas. Necesitamos sitios web o diccionarios bíblicos para ayudarnos a entender lo que los académicos han aprendido sobre las culturas antiguas. También podemos mencionar pasajes bíblicos relacionados para iluminar el pasaje que estamos estudiando.
Algunas respuestas se abordan en el texto. El autor dice estas respuestas de manera explícita para sus lectores.

Aquí hay unos ejemplos de respuestas inferidas del texto de Lucas 2:1-21:

¿Cómo fue experimentar la interrupción por el censo?
- Algunos de los lectores originales quizás recordaron este censo exacto que ocurrió durante el gobierno de Cirenio. Debemos buscarlo.
¿Qué significa que Jesús se llama “Cristo”?
- Necesitamos ayuda mediante pasajes como Salmo 2:2 para proveer el contexto necesario.
¿Cuánto mide el viaje de José y María desde Nazaret hasta Belén? ¿Cómo eran percibidos los pastores por otras personas en ese tiempo?
- La mayoría de los lectores originales entenderían cómo sería viajar desde Galilea hasta Judea e interactuar con pastores. Necesitamos herramientas como sitios web o diccionarios bíblicos para ayudarnos a entender tales cosas.

Aquí hay un ejemplo de algunas respuestas abordadas en el texto:

¿Por qué contrasta Lucas la gloria de Jesús con la de los gobernantes romanos?
- Porque Dios merece la gloria superior (Lucas 2:14). Él está salvando al mundo a través de Cristo, el Señor (Lucas 2:11).
Ahora, ¿qué quiere Lucas que hagamos sobre Jesús?
- En contraste con el poderío de Roma (Lucas 2:1-2), María “guardaba estas cosas en su corazón” (Lucas 2:19, NVI), y los pastores “regresaron glorificando y alabando a Dios” (Lucas 2:20, NVI). Lucas indica que debemos tener reacciones similares.

Por fin, aquí hay posibles preguntas que no son inferidas ni abordadas en el texto. Debemos dejarlas a un lado (al menos en este momento).

¿María caminó o montó en un burro?
¿Jesús nació en un establo o una cueva?
¿Tienen alas los ángeles?
¿Quiénes son “los que gozan de su buena voluntad” (Lucas 2:14, NVI) y qué nos dice sobre la predestinación?

¿Qué otras respuestas puedes encontrar a tus preguntas en el pasaje?

Share or follow:

Context Mattered to Jesus

June 1, 2026 By Ryan Higginbottom

The temptation of Jesus is a fascinating exchange. In this brief passage we find four explicit quotations of Scripture and deep theological themes.

In my last article I wrote about the way Satan misused Psalm 91 when he tempted Jesus to throw himself from the top of the temple (Matt 4:6). We saw that Scripture quoted out of context can be used for evil purposes.

I’m grateful to Seth S., one of our blog commenters, who suggested we look at the other side of this face off. He proposed we examine Jesus’s use of the Old Testament in his resistance of Satan in the wilderness.

This proved too much for a single post, so I will begin the task today and continue it in my next article.

Temptation to Produce Bread

Let’s set the stage. Matthew 3 ends with Jesus’s baptism, and Matthew 4 begins with his temptation.

Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil. And after fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry. And the tempter came and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, command these stones to become loaves of bread.” But he answered, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” (Matthew 4:1–4)

Satan tries to appeal both to Jesus’s hunger and his identity. Surely the Son of God could produce food for himself when he is hungry. Why not do it right here and now?

Jesus’s reply is worth studying in depth.

The Context in Deuteronomy

In all three instances of temptation, Jesus quotes from the book of Deuteronomy to turn away the devil. In the case of Satan’s appeal to turn stones into bread, Jesus looks to Deuteronomy 8.

And he humbled you and let you hunger and fed you with manna, which you did not know, nor did your fathers know, that he might make you know that man does not live by bread alone, but man lives by every word that comes from the mouth of the Lord. (Deuteronomy 8:3)

Finding this verse is important, but we must also know its context.

The book of Deuteronomy is a second statement of the law to the people of Israel, given with an eye toward their upcoming entrance into the promised land. In this book, God reminds Moses what he has done for the nation of Israel, and he charges them with obedience in the future.

Jesus in the Place of Israel

There are several details in Deuteronomy 8 worth noting.

Israel is supposed to remember the way God led them for 40 years in the wilderness (Deut 8:2).
God humbled Israel in the wilderness, testing them to know what was in their heart, whether or not they would keep his commandments (Deut 8:2).
God humbled Israel and let them hunger, feeding them with manna, so that he would make them know that man does not live by bread alone but by every word that comes from God’s mouth (Deut 8:3).
God disciplines Israel in the way that a man disciplines his son (Deut 8:5).
Israel must keep the commandments of God because God is bringing them into a good land, a land with plenty of bread (Deut 8:6–9).

This context helps us to understand Jesus’s purpose.

Jesus has been led by God the Spirit into the wilderness for 40 days (Matt 4:1–2). He voluntarily went hungry for these 40 days (Matt 4:2). Jesus knows he is the Son of God, because he just heard his father say these exact words (Matt 3:17).

And, crucially, by resisting the devil’s first temptation, Jesus shows that he knows man does not live by bread alone; he does not need to learn this through the same discipline Israel faced.

Through examining the context of Matthew 4 and Deuteronomy 8, we discover some profound truths. Jesus has voluntarily put himself in the place of Israel. Furthermore, he has taken the first step in obeying God in this role by showing he depends on God—he does not need to turn stones into bread.

This sets up a crucial question both for the rest of the interaction with Satan and for the rest of the Gospel of Matthew: Will Jesus keep the commandments of the Lord? Will Jesus trust God to bring him through the wilderness and into the land of plenty, rejecting all other gods?

Conclusion

As Christians who know the rest of the Bible, we know the answers to these questions. But Matthew is framing the launch of Jesus’s mission with the themes of obedience, sonship, and substitution.

Be sure to come back to read my next article, when we continue to look at Jesus’s quotations of Scripture to deny the devil’s advances.

This was originally posted in 2020.

Share or follow:

The Savior Saves Because He Wants to Help

May 29, 2026 By Peter Krol

Last week I examined the Savior, the first of three kinds of fool in Proverbs 6:1-19.

At first glance there appears to be little connection between our world and this ancient practice of co-signing someone’s debt. At least that’s what I thought, until the day I led a Bible study on this passage and a girl broke down in tears because her parents had charged thousands of dollars to credit cards in her name. She had always thought it was good for her to rescue her parents by using her own unsullied credit to give them more margin. If she hadn’t, they might not have been able to make a mortgage payment. They might lose a car or their furniture. They might not be able to afford college tuition for her siblings.

Becoming surety, or co-signing loans, is actually so common today that we struggle to believe it’s problematic. Parents co-sign education loans for their children. Young adults share credit cards with their parents. Credit card companies (or other financial service providers) require entrepreneurs to sign a “personal guarantee” on a corporate line of credit. In the event that the business should go bankrupt, the credit card company can require the executive to repay the company’s debt from his personal assets.

Now one could make a case that Solomon never states explicitly that it’s wrong to co-sign a loan. He says only that you should deny yourself sleep until you can get out of the deal. One could also propose that it’s okay to co-sign for a family member since the borrower Solomon has in mind is a “stranger” (Prov 6:1). But I don’t suggest banking your opinion on that single word. It’s parallel to “neighbor,” which has quite a broad range of meaning. (See Prov 3:28.)

However, instead of debating the wisdom or folly of co-signing loans in certain situations, I would prefer to ask a more foundational question. Why does Solomon make this into such a big issue? Out of all the possible money-issues he could focus on, why warn against co-signing loans? Why not prohibit false weights and measures in the marketplace? Why not expose the evil of materialism? Why not denounce theft, bribery, extortion, larceny, or tax evasion?

The answer to these questions lies in yet another question: Why would a person even consider co-signing a loan? Why do people do it, when they know the risk is so great? Those who co-sign loans lack sense (Prov 17:18) and will surely suffer the loss of their own property (Prov 11:15, 22:26-27), so what could motivate someone to do it?

It’s simple: If a person I care about has a need, then I want to help.

Perhaps the person in need has no one else to turn to. Maybe this person has exhausted every option. Perhaps bad luck and bad timing have collided in this person’s life, and I’m in a position to make it better. If I can help my loved one regain equilibrium, then I’ll have done my part. I can make the world a better place, and at least one person will thank me for it.

Note Solomon’s assumptions. Of course it’s important that we love others more than ourselves (Prov 3:27-35). Yes, we must image the Lord by helping those in need. But there are times when the best help we can offer is not to help. In other words, sometimes it’s unloving to rescue people from the consequences of their choices. And co-signing a loan is one of those times.

Wise people know that the need for rescue is urgent, but there’s only one who can accomplish it. There’s a savior, and I’m not he.

Question: How do you struggle with the temptation to rescue needy people?

This post was first published in 2013 and is part of a series walking through Proverbs 1-9.

Share or follow:

OT Quotes in NT: Excel Version Available

May 27, 2026 By Peter Krol

Years back, I posted a spreadsheet listing every instance where the New Testament directly quotes the Old Testament. I included only direct quotes of OT texts, not allusions or echos of OT language, nor references to OT characters or events.

You can find my analysis of the information here, along with a series of posts highlighting the most quoted books, verses, etc.

This document has always lived as a Google Sheet, available to anyone who finds it on our Resources page. One such person, the keen and studious Matt Kauffenstein, wasn’t happy with Google Sheets. So he took matters into his own hands to convert it into an Excel spreadsheet, which you can now find here.

In addition, Matt improved the sheet with a search feature, so instead of scrolling or using Ctrl-F (Cmd-F on a Mac) to find a particular passage, you can now simply enter the text you want into the search box, and the sheet shows you all the matching results. You can search in this way for an OT text or a NT text.

You can find that improved document here. Both documents will settle down and build themselves a nice little cabin on our Resources page with all the other goodies there.

Thank you very much, Matt, for creating this for us and making it available to our readers!

Share or follow:

Cómo interpretar: Hacer preguntas

May 26, 2026 By Peter Krol

————

Publicación original de Peter Krol, traducida por Sarah Oiler

————

La semana pasada, introduje 3 pasos para interpretar la Biblia.

Paso uno fue haz preguntas de tus observaciones:

“Si tú has observado bien, ya estás listo para interpretar.

Toma sus observaciones y haz preguntas. Muchas preguntas. Haz frente a estas observaciones desde todas las direcciones.

Sé lo más curioso posible. Mejora haciendo preguntas, y mejorarás en la interpretación de la Biblia.

Ten en cuenta que tus preguntas deben surgir de tus observaciones del texto. No haz simplemente alguna pregunta antigua. No sientas la necesidad de ser especialmente inteligente. Tu trabajo no es innovar, sino descubrir. (Ten en cuenta que los discípulos no observaron bien, y así formularon preguntas equivocadas en Juan 21: 22-23.)” (traducido por Evangelio blog, modificado por mí)

Las preguntas principales son ¿qué? ¿por qué? y ¿ahora qué?

Las preguntas de “¿qué?” definen los términos del autor (“¿qué quería decir?”)
Las preguntas de “¿por qué?” descubren el propósito del autor (“¿por qué dijo esto?”)
Las preguntas de “¿ahora qué?” destacan las implicaciones de un texto (“¿qué quiere él que yo haga ahora?”)

Por ejemplo, digamos que estás estudiando Lucas 2:1-21. Acabas de observar que hay una idea repetida sobre poder y autoridad. Viste muchas palabras, como “gobierno,” “censo,” “César” y “gloria.” Ahora necesitamos hacer preguntas.

¿Por qué tipo de autoridad está preocupado Lucas? ¿Qué era un gobernador en la Antigua Roma? ¿Cuál era el alcance del poder de César? ¿Qué hará Jesús que es diferente de las otras autoridades? ¿Qué son los ángeles?
- Las preguntas de cómo o qué tan también se pueden incluir aquí: ¿Qué tan largo era el viaje de Nazaret a Belén? ¿Cómo eran percibidos los pastores por la gente durante esta época?
¿Por qué está preocupado Lucas por la idea de poder? ¿Por qué César emitió este decreto? ¿Por qué el autor contrasta la gloria del bebé Jesús con la autoridad de los líderes romanos? ¿Por qué temieron los pastores al ver un ángel?
Ahora, ¿qué nos dice esto sobre dónde reside la autoridad verdadera? Ahora, ¿qué debemos creer sobre Jesús? Ahora, ¿qué debemos esperar cuando Jesús entra en conflicto con el mundo?

¿Qué otras preguntas se te ocurren a partir de tus observaciones de Lucas 2:1-21? Ve si puedes identificar si tu pregunta es del tipo “¿Qué?”, “¿Por qué?” o “Ahora, ¿Qué?”

Share or follow:

Fool #1: The Savior

May 22, 2026 By Peter Krol

Proverbs 6:1-19 describes three kinds of fool.

The first fool is the Savior. This person really, really loves people. Especially needy people. Especially needy people who keep having needs. This person will bend over backwards to meet a need. The Savior will joyfully sacrifice time, money, and energy to help people with their problems. But…the problems never go away. And the people with problems multiply. The Savior attracts them and feels really good about it.

There are times when I am this fool. Could it be that there are times when you are as well?

My son, if you have put up security for your neighbor,
Have given your pledge for a stranger,
If you are snared in the words of your mouth,
Caught in the words of your mouth,
Then do this, my son, and save yourself,
For you have come into the hand of your neighbor:
Go, hasten, and plead urgently with your neighbor.
Give your eyes no sleep
And your eyelids no slumber;
Save yourself like a gazelle from the hand of the hunter,
Like a bird from the hand of the fowler (Prov 6:1-5).

The ancient world had no banks, no wire transfers, and no lines of credit. If you had no cash (in the form of coins), you had no net worth. You might be able to buy some life essentials with livestock, cloth, or labor, but otherwise you were likely to need a loan of some sort.

Tilemahos Efthimiadis (2006), Creative Commons

Another institution unfamiliar to the ancient world was the credit bureau. If you wanted to borrow money from me, I couldn’t run a credit check to prove your ability to repay the loan. So to lower risk, I could only get a sense of your character by talking to your family and friends. But to be really safe, I would require two signatures on the loan papers – one from you and one from your surety. Your surety was the person who promised to pay me back if somehow you found yourself unable to do so.

In Prov 6:1, Solomon writes to the person who has become the surety for another. He addresses the one who “put up security” and gave a pledge to repay someone else’s loan in case of default.

What’s at stake for this person? As a surety, you have “come into the hand of your neighbor” (Prov 6:3). If the borrower defaults, you become obligated to pay the debt. You have become a slave to someone else’s circumstances, and you ought not rest until you free yourself (Prov 6:4). You’re road kill unless you find a way out (Prov 6:5). You should not make such pledges. If you already have, nullify them at all costs.

Saviors like these weren’t limited to ancient Israel. Next week I’ll show how they’re still thriving and saving today.

Question: Where do you see the “Savior” in our generation?

This post was first published in 2013 and is part of a series walking through Proverbs 1-9.

Share or follow:

Don’t Be Embarrassed by the Cursing Psalms

May 20, 2026 By Peter Krol

Have you ever come across those poems of cursing in the book of Psalms? Scholars call them “imprecatory psalms,” which just means that they contain requests for judgment on evil. And not a general judgment on a vague sense of evil, but a concrete and specific sort.

May his children be fatherless and his wife a widow! (Psalm 109:9)

Arise, O LORD! Save me, O my God! For you strike all my enemies on the cheek; you break the teeth of the wicked. (Psalm 3:7)

Let their way be dark and slippery, with the angel of the LORD pursuing them! (Psalm 35:6)

It is quite common to find psalmists asking God to judge their enemies in such ways. Many have struggled with these psalms, such as C.S. Lewis, who believed them full of “vindictive hatred” (Reflections on the Psalms).

Here’s the question: Are such psalms opposed to Jesus’ instructions to love our enemies and pray for our persecutors? Do such prayers of cursing represent an older way of selfish thinking that has been reversed by the coming of the new covenant? And what should Bible teachers or Bible study leaders do when we come to such psalms in our study or teaching?

Daniel R. Hyde addresses these questions and more in this thorough piece on the imprecatory psalms. Hyde writes particularly to preachers, but his insights apply easily to any teacher or small group leader as well. According to Hyde:

Imprecations in the Psalms are not an embarrassment to be managed. They are part of the Scriptures that “bear witness” to “the things concerning” Jesus (John 5:39; Luke 24:27; 24:44). If these prayers make us uncomfortable, that discomfort is no reason to avoid or edit them—it’s a reason to learn how to preach them. As Elizabeth Achtemeier said, “If we have some problem with a passage in the Old Testament, it is not the Bible’s problem. It is ours.” The question is not whether Christians may pray for God’s justice, but how.

Hyde shows us that the imprecatory psalms enable us to hand justice over to God so we’re not tempted to execute it ourselves. He gives three reasons why God gave us the cursing psalms.

They hand vengeance to God
They teach the church to long for the kingdom
They form the whole person before God

He goes on to explain to go about teaching these psalms in a Christian context. In the face of great evil, do not deprive yourself of the one weapon (prayer) God has given you to directly resist it. Hyde’s counsel is well worth your time.

Check it out!

Share or follow:

Otro enemigo de la interpretación es el relativismo

May 19, 2026 By Peter Krol

————

Publicación original de Peter Krol, traducida por Sarah Oiler

————

Ayer escribí, “la observación descuidada causa directamente una interpretación incorrecta.” Alguien se preguntaría si hay tal cosa como la “interpretación incorrecta”.

SÍ, hay.

En Lucas 7:18-19, Juan el Bautista quería asegurarse de que tenía la interpretación correcta.

En Marcos 12:24-27, Jesús culpó a los saduceos por tener la interpretación incorrecta.

El apóstol Pedro nos dice que la ignorancia o la inestabilidad pueden causar que alguien tergiverse o malinterprete la Biblia. Esta práctica tiene consecuencias funestas (2 Pedro 3:15-16).

He escuchado que algunas personas dicen que la Biblia “significa lo que quieres que signifique.”

Aunque aprecio el deseo de relevancia, ¿podría sugerir que el relativismo extremo, de hecho, es contraproducente? Si la comunicación pudiera significar cualquier cosa que desee el receptor, no existiría la comunicación significativa. El orador o escritor tiene la intención de transmitir un significado específico. Podemos estar de acuerdo o no, pero no podemos ignorar que existe una intención original.

O sea, cuando alguien dice que algo significa lo que quieres que signifique, una respuesta provechosa y respetuosa podría ser: “¿De verdad lo dices en serio?”

De todas formas, trabajemos duro para descubrir lo que significa.

Share or follow:

Quoting Scripture Contrary to Its Purpose is Devilish

May 18, 2026 By Ryan Higginbottom

*Temptation of Christ* (1663), Philips Augustijn Immenraet, public domain

Have you ever tried to hammer a nail with a hand saw? When was the last time you flipped a pancake with a whisk?

Using tools or utensils for unintended purposes just doesn’t work.

Context Matters

When it comes to the Bible, proper usage is even more important, because we are dealing with God’s word.

We have devoted many articles on this blog to the importance of context in the Bible. We have called attention to numerous examples of the proper use of Scripture, respecting the location of phrases and verses within paragraphs, chapters, and books.

But we can learn through both positive and negative examples. So today, we’ll look at a Bible quotation used out of context. And we won’t just look at any example, we’ll look in the Bible itself at an example of the misuse of Scripture.

The Temptation of Jesus

After Jesus is baptized, he is led by the Spirit to be tempted by the devil (Matthew 4:1). Jesus rebuffs Satan’s three-part temptation by quoting the Bible at each turn. (This narrative is found in both Matthew 4:1–11 and Luke 4:1–13. I’ll use Matthew’s version.)

This section of Scripture is often used to illustrate the value of knowing the Bible. Memorizing God’s word is a mighty tool in resisting temptation. This is all very good.

But in one of Satan’s temptations, he quotes the Bible, and that is worth exploring.

Then the devil took him to the holy city and set him on the pinnacle of the temple and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down, for it is written, ‘He will command his angels concerning you,’ and ‘On their hands they will bear you up, lest you strike your foot against a stone.’”(Matthew 4:5–6)

The devil cites Psalm 91:11–12 and, taken as quoted, the verses are compelling. God seems to promise protection in angelic form, without a qualification in sight. If we stick to Satan’s words, his case is persuasive.

Exploring Psalm 91

Jesus’s reply to the devil is simple, coming straight from Deuteronomy 6:16.

Jesus said to him, “Again it is written, ‘You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.’” (Matthew 4:7)

How exactly is what Satan offers a test of God?

Instead of a blanket promise of safety, Psalm 91 is about God’s protection for those who seek their shelter in him. This thread runs throughout the psalm.

It is he who “dwells in the shelter of the Most High” that will “abide in the shadow of the Almighty” (Psalm 91:1).
The psalmist replies to this promise by calling God “My refuge and my fortress, my God in whom I trust” (Psalm 91:2).
The psalmist says that “Because you have made the Lord your dwelling place,” “no evil shall be allowed to befall you” (Psalm 91:9–10, emphasis mine).
God says, “Because he holds fast to me in love, I will deliver him; I will protect him, because he knows my name” (Psalm 91:14).
Finally, this “holding fast” to God takes a specific form: “When he calls to me, I will answer him; I will be with him in trouble; I will rescue him and honor him” (Psalm 91:15).

Psalm 91 does not offer a safety net to rescue everyone from the consequences of reckless behavior. Rather, God promises his protection to those who make him their dwelling place. To those who call to him. To those who hold fast to him in love.

Consider the Text

In the title of this article, I claim that the quoting of Scripture contrary to its purpose is devilish. I mean, very simply, that this is a tactic of the devil.

Not everyone who quotes Scripture in this way is evil or is possessed by a demon. But we should be sobered as we observe this strategy. The Bible can be used as a tool to accomplish evil purposes. The words of God are not a magical incantation of righteousness.

This understanding should affect the way we listen to sermons, digest proof texts, and read theological arguments. Let’s give ourselves to a careful study of the Bible, that we might recognize and avoid this devilish error.

This was originally posted in 2020.

Share or follow:

The Savior, the Sluggard, and the Sower of Discord

May 15, 2026 By Peter Krol

In recent years, I’ve learned that much of parenting involves helping the children learn not to do dumb stuff that hurts themselves and others. One child destroys every tower and confiscates every treasure, then wonders why no other children want to play together. Another child leaps from couch to coffee table and back again, wondering how far the gap can widen before something bad happens. Yet another finds a bag of sweets, devours the entirety in secret, and moans over the ensuing tummy ache.

One glorious incident involved our basement’s air hockey table. One child—who was typically more curious than a PhD candidate—wraps the table’s electrical cord around the rear axle of a big wheel. This child then mounts the vehicle, hits the gas, and begins taking measurements. I’m not sure which hypothesis was being tested, but the experiment resulted in our household inventory becoming minus one air hockey table. And that child went on basement probation for a few weeks.

I scratch my head at these kids until I realize I’m no different. I do dumb things and act surprised when they don’t turn out well. I’ve already written of the time I photocopied my hindquarters at summer camp. With a broken machine, a gash on my thigh, and a humiliating confession behind me, a camp legend was born. Even today, I stay up too late at night and wonder why I’m too tired to carry out important tasks the next day. I belittle my wife in public and get upset when she’s not affectionate with me in private.

Solomon wrote Proverbs 6 to help fools like us: those in danger of harming themselves and ruining the people they love.

Now most people read Proverbs for its practical advice. They crave cuts of beefy counsel to sink their teeth into. They want help with their finances or career path or relationships, but by the end of Proverbs 5, these spiritual carnivores feel like the steakhouse is always under construction and never open for business. So in Proverbs 6, Solomon finally serves up dense shanks for thoughtful chewing.

Proverbs 6:1-19 digresses from the big-picture framework of wisdom to portray three specific kinds of fool. The “Savior” tries to rescue needy people himself rather than pointing them to Jesus (Prov 6:1-5). The “Sluggard” makes a series of lazy choices that take him farther and farther from the Lord (Prov 6:6-11). The “Sower of Discord” breaks up the body of Christ, risking God’s condemnation, which could be atoned for by the broken body of Christ (Prov 6:12-19).

This section is unique in Prov 1-9 in that it doesn’t contain a command to listen. Did Solomon omit the command because his audience should have internalized it by now? He’s given enough theory; now he gets painfully specific. And the assumed question hangs in the background: Will you listen to instruction, even if it hurts to do so?

Question: Which of the three fools can you relate with?

This post was first published in 2013 and is part of a series walking through Proverbs 1-9.

Share or follow: