Observing structure is a lost art in much Bible study. We fixate on a few verses, and we fail to look for larger literary patterns in larger portions of text. But most Bible books would have been read orally, and authors used larger literary patterns to help people retain information. Public speakers do the same thing today when they repeat and reiterate and reinforce their points through rhythmic patterns of variation. (Just think of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s famous “I have a dream” speech.)
In his wonderful book, The Literary Structure of the Old Testament, David A. Dorsey enumerates 10 benefits gained by observing structure:
1. Appreciation of literary artistry
God’s word is not simply true; it is also beautiful, just like he is.
2. Identification of unit boundaries
Knowing the structure might help you break up the passage sensibly for your Bible study or sermon series.
3. Discovery of the rationale behind a unit’s overall layout
When you can’t figure out why events are in such a strange order, perhaps the author arranged them purposefully to make a certain point.
4. Clarification of the relationship of the parts to the whole
Tracking structure will help you to keep the smaller episodes or stanzas connected to the main point of the whole book.
5. Accounting for repetitions
For example, why does Genesis 6-9 keep repeating the names of Noah’s sons (Gen 6:10, 7:13, 9:18)? They serve as markers for the structure.
- The world is bad (sons named)
- God gives Noah instructions
- A sampling of all living things (sons named) get on the ark
- Waters rise
- God remembers the ark’s inhabitants
- Waters fall
- Waters rise
- The living things (including the sons, unnamed this time) get off the ark
- A sampling of all living things (sons named) get on the ark
- God gives Noah instructions
- God gives Noah instructions
- The world is still bad (sons named)
6. Accounting for apparently misplaced units
Some scholars don’t know what to do with passages like Genesis 38 or Nehemiah 5 or Isaiah 36-39 that seem to be completely misplaced (way out of order) within their books. But these placements make more sense when we consider the outlines of those books.
7. Clarification of a unit by comparison with its match
For example, Jonah’s prayer in Jonah 2 appears pious and repentant until you consider the parallel prayer in chapter 4. Suddenly his repentance doesn’t look very repentant.
8. A check on redaction-critical theories
For a hundred and fifty years or so, unbelieving scholars spent their time picking apart books of the Bible and showing how all the parts couldn’t have been written by the same person. However, this approach isn’t so common anymore, as the unity and beauty (see point #1 above) of each book speaks a more compelling truth.
9. Discovery of a unit’s main point
Here is something truly worth getting pumped up for. Sometimes a passage’s main point is more implicit than explicit, and the author tucks that point right into his shaping of the composition.
10. Discovery of a composition’s theme
A theme is an idea woven into the fabric of a book. That theme might not be clear until you’ve seen it crop up in many sections. Observing structure brings themes into the foreground.
So much for the principles. To see them in action, look at how much difference structure makes in each gospel’s telling of the feeding of the 5,000. Through the context and structure of each Gospel, we see that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John can use the same event for a different purpose.
————————–
Disclosure: The Amazon link above is an affiliate link, so if you click it and buy stuff you’ll support this site at no extra cost to yourself.
Michael M says
Is there something to learn from the order of the Psalms, from Psalm 1,2,3 – 150? I love that the psalms end with psalm 150, ‘praise God everyone, everywhere, and w/ every instrument’. Psalm 150 is a fitting end, it seems right to be last, as if its the last movement of a symphony and the right response is now stand up and end this book with praise praise and more praise.
I’ve been outlining and studying the psalms and was wondering if it is right to learn from the order: such as Psalm 1 & 2. Are we supposed to learn more about Psalm 1 because of Psalm 2? Psalm 1 seems to focus on the individual, “blessed is the man.” Psalm 2 begins with a focus on the corporate/global mankind, “why do the nations rage in vain?” It seems in the macro the psalms have an order and progression. But what about from psalms to psalm? Does God intend for us to learn from the macro order and the micro?
Peter Krol says
Absolutely, Michael! The Psalms have an intentional arrangement. Notice how they’re self-consciously arranged into 5 “books” (Psalms 1-41, 42-72, 73-89, 90-106, 107-150). Interesting patterns emerge when you compare the beginning and ending of each Book. There can also be a striking flow of thought and emotion from psalm to psalm.
I would agree with you that Psalms 1 & 2 are special. They are almost the only psalms in Book 1 not written by David. They serve as an introduction to all the Psalms: They begin (Psalm 1:1) and end (Psalm 2:12b) with blessings pronounced on those who love God’s law and God’s king. The rest of the Psalms unpack what it means to love these two things.
Bill McCabe says
Allow me to say thank you for bringing to light so many texts that have forever been hidden in presumption.
I will be teaching at a pastor’s conference in Uganda, and I promise you, I will be referencing your work more than once!!!
Peter Krol says
You’re welcome, Bill, and thanks for the encouragement. What is the topic for your conference teaching? And what part of Uganda? My sons were born near Fort Portal.